Link para seçãoRecursos de Sintaxe
Link para seçãoRecursos de String
Link para seçãoRecursos de Array
Link para seçãoSet Features
Link para seçãoObject Features
Link para seçãoRecursos Assíncronos (Async)
Link para seçãoAPIs do Navegador
Link para seçãoPontos Problemáticos da Linguagem
Link para seçãoPontos Problemáticos das APIs do Navegador
My 2025 Pick: Delba Oliveira
Ankita Kulkarni
Link para seçãoNew Proposals
While Temporal still tops the rankings, excitement is down from last year, which makes sense as it has begun its transition from theoretical proposal to actually being implemented in Firefox.
Link para seçãoRecursos Ausentes
No change in ranking in the top 5, but it's notable to see that interest in Signals did drop slightly compared to last year.
Link para seçãoNative Types
While 32% of respondents are hoping for in-browser runtime types support in JavaScript, if types are ever officially supported it seems much more likely to be through TypeScript-like type annotations, which came in at number one.
Link para seçãoPace of Change
This question's aim was to get a rough idea of how well respondents are keeping up with new features, and it shows that most of us struggle to learn about–let alone try out–new language features Hopefully this is something these survey results can help with!
Link para seçãoLista de leitura
The Reading List lets respondents learn more about specific items post-survey, and this year we tweaked it to support auto-adding items based on survey answers, in addition to letting respondents select items manually. This change led to a much more library-focused list, compared to previous years which included more features.