跳到内容

State of JavaScript 2025

库

Libraries Experience & Sentiment

Vite has been the most-loved library for a few years now, but it has now overtaken React to also become the #2 most-used item, and seems ready to take the top spot next year.

Meanwhile, while Next.js is the 13th most-loved project, it's also the 5th most-hated, and generated the most comments overall–which goes to show just how polarizing the framework can be.

Category:

Baseline Status:

通过...分组：

根据此项排序:

01
构建工具
86.4%
11.5%
11,342
02
构建工具
84.4%
12.8%
11,348
03
前端框架
83.6%
14.4%
12,130
04
后端框架
79.9%
16.6%
11,689
05
测试
74.4%
21%
3.6%
11,421
06
元框架
58.6%
39.6%
11,845
07
测试
56.1%
30.5%
12.9%
11,385
08
构建工具
53.8%
32.5%
13%
11,271
09
测试
53.8%
30.8%
15.1%
11,396
10
构建工具
52.7%
14.1%
32.5%
11,264

经验

  • <span aria-hidden="true">🤓</span> 用过: 使用过此项目的受访者。
  • <span aria-hidden="true">👀</span> 有听说过: 听说过此项目，但没有使用过此项目的受访者。
  • <span aria-hidden="true">🤷</span> 没听说过: 从未听说过此项目的受访者。

情绪（态度）

  • 积极: 有兴趣了解此技术，或者愿意再次使用它的受访者
  • 中立: 未对此技术发表看法的受访者
  • 消极: 对此技术不感兴趣，或者使用此技术有糟糕体验的受访者
“Used” average:27%
“Positive” average:21%
“Negative” average:19%

随时间变化

JavaScript libraries commonly display a "boomerang" pattern over time: boosted by early positivity (line goes right), usage increases (line shoots up), but users then get confronted with more edge cases and real-world issues, and opinions can become more negative (line veers left).

This means any project that moves to the right (such as Vue.js) or even just stays vertical (such as Astro) is worth paying attention to!

每条时间从2016到2020年。较高的点表示更多的人在使用该技术。 较右则的点意昧着更多的受访者想要学习它；或者已经使用过并且会再次使用它。

Category:

X轴范围消极观点积极观点Y轴范围用过未使用过React. 速度: 26.32. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.react, 2016:大多数是积极的意见 (68.52%), (5.28%)react, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (69.36%), (23.93%)react, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (67.98%), (43.03%)react, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (67.43%), (60.47%)react, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (63.25%), (60.02%)react, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (53.12%), (59.8%)react, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (52.86%), (63.52%)react, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (42.61%), (68.81%)react, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (35.37%), (64.28%)react, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (31.01%), (69.1%)Vue.js. 速度: 110.51. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.vuejs, 2016:大多数是积极的意见 (8.91%), (-79.95%)vuejs, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (47.39%), (-56.96%)vuejs, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (52.2%), (-36.72%)vuejs, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (49.65%), (-7.19%)vuejs, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (46.96%), (-2.06%)vuejs, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (30.62%), (2.38%)vuejs, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (25.88%), (-7.74%)vuejs, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (26.26%), (0.23%)vuejs, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (29.75%), (8.44%)vuejs, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (27.71%), (11.75%)Angular. 速度: 28.53. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.angular, 2016:大多数是积极的意见 (7.76%), (-60.04%)angular, 2017:大多是负面意见 (-10.26%), (-43.16%)angular, 2018:大多是负面意见 (-31.44%), (15.44%)angular, 2019:大多是负面意见 (-36.53%), (15.45%)angular, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-35.04%), (11.6%)angular, 2021:大多是负面意见 (-36.52%), (7.83%)angular, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-37.28%), (-2.5%)angular, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-34.65%), (-8.34%)angular, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-19.24%), (5.56%)angular, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-25.72%), (1.98%)Preact. 速度: 19.83. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.preact, 2018:大多是负面意见 (-4.48%), (-85.1%)preact, 2019:大多是负面意见 (-5.39%), (-75.65%)preact, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-5.74%), (-73.15%)preact, 2021:大多是负面意见 (-17.47%), (-71.95%)preact, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-12.11%), (-74.44%)preact, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-17.73%), (-72.53%)preact, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-20.43%), (-56.01%)preact, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-16.52%), (-53.21%)Svelte. 速度: 50.43. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.svelte, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (28.21%), (-84.44%)svelte, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (34.33%), (-70.91%)svelte, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (42.28%), (-60.33%)svelte, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (45.3%), (-57.8%)svelte, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (44.67%), (-48.42%)svelte, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (32.04%), (-37.26%)svelte, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (29.17%), (-34.97%)Alpine.js. 速度: 31.01. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.alpinejs, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-5.48%), (-93.31%)alpinejs, 2021:大多是负面意见 (-10.94%), (-88.64%)alpinejs, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-12.58%), (-87.8%)alpinejs, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-16.14%), (-84.67%)alpinejs, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-13.18%), (-57.17%)alpinejs, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-12.52%), (-55.24%)Lit. 速度: 29.1. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.litelement, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-1.58%), (-89.25%)litelement, 2021:大多是负面意见 (-2.27%), (-85.9%)litelement, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-6.88%), (-87.73%)litelement, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-4.8%), (-84.18%)litelement, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-6.78%), (-56.29%)litelement, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-6.86%), (-54.86%)Solid. 速度: 41.62. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.solid, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (6.02%), (-94.44%)solid, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (23.7%), (-87.53%)solid, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (15.58%), (-82.11%)solid, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (9.51%), (-61.22%)solid, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (11.64%), (-58.44%)Qwik. 速度: 3.26. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.qwik, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (17.05%), (-96.41%)qwik, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (3.54%), (-91.85%)qwik, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-6.44%), (-65.24%)qwik, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-11.32%), (-64.76%)Stencil. 速度: 26.96. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.stencil, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-9.72%), (-91.42%)stencil, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-17.23%), (-90.98%)stencil, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-11.81%), (-62.1%)stencil, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-11.92%), (-62.25%)HTMX. 速度: 4.59. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.htmx, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (10.69%), (-89.74%)htmx, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-5.88%), (-66.61%)htmx, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-10.73%), (-63.72%)Next.js. 速度: 76.03. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.nextjs, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (24.14%), (-80.42%)nextjs, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (49.52%), (-45.5%)nextjs, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (55.25%), (-26.64%)nextjs, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (53.11%), (-10.27%)nextjs, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (53.66%), (-2.91%)nextjs, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (33.21%), (14.11%)nextjs, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (12.27%), (14.61%)nextjs, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-3.08%), (22.84%)Nuxt. 速度: 20.55. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.nuxt, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (9.77%), (-66.36%)nuxt, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (8.22%), (-60.43%)nuxt, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (5.26%), (-63.96%)nuxt, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (2.19%), (-53.1%)nuxt, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (0.66%), (-37.78%)nuxt, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (0.06%), (-36.09%)Gatsby. 速度: -66.62. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，会有更多积极的意见和/或使用.gatsby, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (36.2%), (-50.33%)gatsby, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (16.23%), (-43.78%)gatsby, 2021:大多是负面意见 (-12.47%), (-46.5%)gatsby, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-28.12%), (-54.18%)gatsby, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-50.01%), (-54.01%)gatsby, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-38.61%), (-43.26%)gatsby, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-38.65%), (-42.09%)Remix. 速度: 4.28. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.remix, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (23.1%), (-90.13%)remix, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (13.43%), (-84.42%)remix, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (3.14%), (-79.16%)remix, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (2.93%), (-57.53%)remix, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-10.65%), (-52.08%)Astro. 速度: 83.52. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.astro, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (11.43%), (-93.52%)astro, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (26.54%), (-82.41%)astro, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (31.33%), (-61.89%)astro, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (29.42%), (-36.43%)astro, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (29.62%), (-28.19%)SvelteKit. 速度: 19.95. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.sveltekit, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (27.75%), (-80.31%)sveltekit, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (29.52%), (-76.26%)sveltekit, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (27.1%), (-64.41%)sveltekit, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (14.58%), (-47.07%)sveltekit, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (12.44%), (-45.05%)Docusaurus. 速度: 22.89. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.docusaurus, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (8.56%), (-83.28%)docusaurus, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (1.27%), (-79.41%)docusaurus, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (0.1%), (-54.21%)docusaurus, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-1.11%), (-50.71%)SolidStart. 速度: 26.31. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.solidstart, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (4.37%), (-94.2%)solidstart, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (0.65%), (-66.2%)solidstart, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-0.28%), (-63.23%)Deno Fresh. 速度: 31.07. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.fresh, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-0.54%), (-94.1%)fresh, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (1.8%), (-66.12%)fresh, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-0.6%), (-62.95%)Quasar. 速度: 27.08. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.quasar, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-2.89%), (-92.95%)quasar, 2021:大多是负面意见 (-5.24%), (-91.03%)quasar, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-6.04%), (-91.81%)quasar, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-8.36%), (-89.06%)quasar, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-3.99%), (-65.54%)quasar, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-4.78%), (-63.96%)Express. 速度: 7.43. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.express, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (62.76%), (32.68%)express, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (68.36%), (37.28%)express, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (71.66%), (54.7%)express, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (71.26%), (60.24%)express, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (63.71%), (61.98%)express, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (42.11%), (60.75%)NestJS. 速度: 52.54. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.nest, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (12.19%), (-74.33%)nest, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (14.84%), (-61.67%)nest, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (9.07%), (-18.66%)Fastify. 速度: 52.83. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.fastify, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (7.2%), (-87.99%)fastify, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (16.22%), (-78.73%)fastify, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (10.44%), (-38.39%)Strapi. 速度: 26.04. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.strapi, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (6.94%), (-81.79%)strapi, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (7.12%), (-74.98%)strapi, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-4%), (-44.8%)Koa. 速度: 11.42. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.koa, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (7.26%), (-77.73%)koa, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (0.44%), (-82.13%)koa, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (3.74%), (-71.79%)koa, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-0.15%), (-68.97%)koa, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-7.61%), (-51.44%)Hapi. 速度: 14.28. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.hapi, 2017:大多是负面意见 (-0.86%), (-81.8%)hapi, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-9.19%), (-81.66%)hapi, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-6.72%), (-61.64%)Jest. 速度: 147.96. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.jest, 2016:大多数是积极的意见 (6.44%), (-84%)jest, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (42.04%), (-47.24%)jest, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (58.96%), (-17.8%)jest, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (76.61%), (27.02%)jest, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (78.95%), (36.59%)jest, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (75.27%), (45.4%)jest, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (64.98%), (36.54%)jest, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (51.12%), (48.58%)jest, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (28.34%), (45.06%)jest, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (19.14%), (51.25%)Mocha. 速度: -68.09. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，会有更多积极的意见和/或使用.mocha, 2016:大多数是积极的意见 (62.19%), (-2.98%)mocha, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (55.53%), (3.54%)mocha, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (41.56%), (-4.2%)mocha, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (36.4%), (8.14%)mocha, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (28.61%), (5.4%)mocha, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (14.57%), (0.55%)mocha, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (9.26%), (-12.42%)mocha, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-7.12%), (-9.14%)mocha, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-6.82%), (-9.91%)mocha, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-6.93%), (-1.95%)Storybook. 速度: 71.11. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.storybook, 2018:大多数是积极的意见 (31.26%), (-65.34%)storybook, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (47.84%), (-29.88%)storybook, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (53.06%), (-15.73%)storybook, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (52.76%), (-4.13%)storybook, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (46.97%), (-10.75%)storybook, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (45.6%), (4.08%)storybook, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (21.2%), (9.62%)storybook, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (19.43%), (17.58%)Cypress. 速度: 13.74. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.cypress, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (41.46%), (-48.85%)cypress, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (51.61%), (-29.83%)cypress, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (53.55%), (-14.58%)cypress, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (44.64%), (-15.49%)cypress, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (28.99%), (-5.76%)cypress, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (7.98%), (-0.01%)cypress, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (1.93%), (4.42%)Puppeteer. 速度: 13.5. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.puppeteer, 2019:大多数是积极的意见 (36.03%), (-45.41%)puppeteer, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (37.56%), (-33.02%)puppeteer, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (30.26%), (-26.09%)puppeteer, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (22.35%), (-31.36%)puppeteer, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (19.91%), (-21.08%)puppeteer, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (8.01%), (-14.54%)puppeteer, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (8.53%), (-4.4%)Testing Library. 速度: 27.01. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.testing_library, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (33.13%), (-47.16%)testing_library, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (42.61%), (-29.66%)testing_library, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (38.58%), (-30.77%)testing_library, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (33.64%), (-19.91%)testing_library, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (22.02%), (-15.38%)testing_library, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (21.98%), (-8.99%)Playwright. 速度: 137.51. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.playwright, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (8.84%), (-93.37%)playwright, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (17.69%), (-81%)playwright, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (30.42%), (-68.54%)playwright, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (49.93%), (-40.47%)playwright, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (35.46%), (-12.69%)playwright, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (42.97%), (10%)WebdriverIO. 速度: 19.57. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.webdriverio, 2020:大多是负面意见 (-0.51%), (-80.11%)webdriverio, 2021:大多是负面意见 (-5.16%), (-80.52%)webdriverio, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-6.16%), (-82.65%)webdriverio, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-8.57%), (-82.46%)webdriverio, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-6.85%), (-57.67%)webdriverio, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-6.87%), (-54.17%)Vitest. 速度: 147.58. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.vitest, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (16.75%), (-94.66%)vitest, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (30.87%), (-71.88%)vitest, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (54.65%), (-33.53%)vitest, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (43.27%), (-5.97%)vitest, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (52.21%), (17.46%)Selenium. 速度: 9.12. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.selenium, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-11.72%), (-33.01%)selenium, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-34.28%), (-25.12%)selenium, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-25.99%), (-16.45%)selenium, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-25.74%), (-9.85%)TestCafe. 速度: 25.57. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.testcafe, 2022:大多是负面意见 (-6.83%), (-92.05%)testcafe, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-12.54%), (-90.96%)testcafe, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-5.5%), (-67.05%)testcafe, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-5.55%), (-67.75%)Mock Service Worker. 速度: 19.97. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.mock_service_worker, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (16.97%), (-74.45%)mock_service_worker, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (9.49%), (-52.18%)mock_service_worker, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (10.23%), (-47.75%)Node Test Runner. 速度: 5.41. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.node_test_runner, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (11.77%), (-56.53%)node_test_runner, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (8.22%), (-47.57%)webpack. 速度: -37.39. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，会有更多积极的意见和/或使用.webpack, 2016:大多数是积极的意见 (66.01%), (6.39%)webpack, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (81.67%), (46.16%)webpack, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (71.9%), (77.36%)webpack, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (47.42%), (78.37%)webpack, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (25.17%), (69.55%)webpack, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-7.34%), (80.12%)webpack, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-24.48%), (70.95%)webpack, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-38.45%), (73.45%)Parcel. 速度: -18.12. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，会有更多积极的意见和/或使用.parcel, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (32.11%), (-45.24%)parcel, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (25.9%), (-37.94%)parcel, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (8.9%), (-45.64%)parcel, 2023:大多是负面意见 (-4.58%), (-41.32%)parcel, 2024:大多是负面意见 (-4.15%), (-31.58%)parcel, 2025:大多是负面意见 (-4.97%), (-26.28%)Rollup. 速度: 87.5. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.rollup, 2017:大多数是积极的意见 (14.6%), (-78.44%)rollup, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (28.33%), (-39.83%)rollup, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (28.62%), (-22.14%)rollup, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (18.73%), (-27.31%)rollup, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (27.17%), (-12.11%)rollup, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (18.89%), (-3.88%)rollup, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (21.06%), (2.59%)tsc CLI. 速度: -64.43. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，会有更多积极的意见和/或使用.tsc, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (59.11%), (23.36%)tsc, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (76.88%), (57.36%)tsc, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (38.36%), (-2.9%)tsc, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (31.69%), (4.3%)tsc, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (15.84%), (-1.61%)tsc, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (14.88%), (3.15%)SWC. 速度: 75.12. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.swc, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (1.86%), (-98.24%)swc, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (18.45%), (-85.43%)swc, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (17.27%), (-74.73%)swc, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (29.67%), (-49.08%)swc, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (11.11%), (-34.95%)swc, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (9.19%), (-30.44%)esbuild. 速度: 117.47. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.esbuild, 2020:大多数是积极的意见 (15.85%), (-89.08%)esbuild, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (48.14%), (-47.48%)esbuild, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (42.47%), (-38.22%)esbuild, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (52.68%), (1.29%)esbuild, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (31.26%), (8.63%)esbuild, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (29.5%), (14.73%)Vite. 速度: 137.74. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.vite, 2021:大多数是积极的意见 (52.01%), (-40.11%)vite, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (68.76%), (-2.56%)vite, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (82.74%), (46.63%)vite, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (72.3%), (59.66%)vite, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (78.11%), (71.52%)Turbopack. 速度: 27.7. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.turbopack, 2022:大多数是积极的意见 (37.31%), (-89.57%)turbopack, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (23.24%), (-67.33%)turbopack, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (5.73%), (-41.43%)turbopack, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (0.77%), (-25.32%)tsup. 速度: 26.76. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.tsup, 2023:大多数是积极的意见 (6.8%), (-85%)tsup, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (2.79%), (-60.6%)tsup, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (3.04%), (-54.47%)Rspack. 速度: 7.32. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.rspack, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (9.23%), (-66.81%)rspack, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (6.71%), (-56.96%)Rolldown. 速度: 21.88. 总的来说，随着时间的推移，负面意见越来越多，使用率越来越低.rolldown, 2024:大多数是积极的意见 (14.19%), (-70.09%)rolldown, 2025:大多数是积极的意见 (20.08%), (-54.09%)

传奇

越来越受欢迎

人气下降

  • 有些线条跳过了几年。
  • 只有一年数据的技术没有显示。
  • 速度公式 = (最新的意见 - 最旧的意见) + (最新的使用) - (最旧的使用)
  • 积极的速度意味着使用或积极的意见随着时间的推移而增加。
We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

My 2025 Pick: Bree Hall

My pick is Bree Hall, she's been doing great work and we're lucky to have her as part of the community.
We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

Shaundai Person

Senior Software Engineer at Netflix

代码库层级列表

By having a satisfaction ratio above 90%, Hono and Bun make a well-deserved entrance into the S-tier this year.

前端框架
元框架
后端框架
测试工具
构建工具
S
90%
98%
Vite
97%
Vitest
95%
Hono
94%
Playwright
94%
Astro
91%
Bun
A
80%
89%
Testing Library
88%
esbuild
88%
SvelteKit
87%
Mock Service Worker
86%
Fastify
86%
Svelte
85%
tsup
84%
Rollup
84%
Node Test Runner
84%
Vue.js
83%
SWC
83%
tRPC
81%
Express
81%
Preact
80%
Nuxt
B
60%
74%
tsc CLI
73%
NestJS
72%
React
70%
Puppeteer
69%
Storybook
69%
Docusaurus
68%
Remix
66%
Turbopack
65%
Parcel
65%
Jest
64%
Koa
C
56.99999999999999%
Cypress
55.00000000000001%
Mocha
55.00000000000001%
Next.js
54%
Strapi
48%
Angular
26%
webpack
24%
Selenium
24%
Gatsby

该图表会根据代码库的满意度对代码库进行排名 满意度指的是“会再次使用这个库的人数”。 请注意，使用率不到 10% 的代码库不包括在内。

Ratios over Time

The prize for largest relative usage increase goes to Vitest and Playwright, which both gained 14 percentage points year-over-year.

Meanwhile, Rolldown saw a huge increase in name recognition, going from *33%% to 51% awareness. And when looking at satisfaction, Next.js experienced the largest drop, going from 68% to 55%.

Finally, it's also interesting to see that both Preact and React fare much better among respondents who have actually used them than those who have merely heard about the libraries (as shown in the Appreciation tab).

使用度:

使用过某个项目的受访者比例

Filters:

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
webpack
React
Vite
Express
Jest
Next.js
Storybook
esbuild
Vitest
tsc CLI

满意度 对比 使用率

With this year's inclusion of back-end frameworks, Express has joined Vite, React, and Jest in the coveted top-right quadrant. But Vue.js, Storybook, and Vitest are not far behind!

前端框架
元框架
后端框架
测试工具
构建工具

这张图表显示了每种技术对其总 用户数量 的 满意率。 它可以分为四个象限：

  • 评估: 使用率较低，满意度较高。值得关注的技术。

  • 采用: 使用率高，满意度高。可采用安全技术。

  • 规避: 使用率低，满意度低。目前最好避免使用的技术。

  • 待定: 使用率高，满意度低。如果你正在使用这些技术，请重新评估它们。

资源推荐

Complete Intro to React, v9
Brian Holt
Neon

Complete Intro to React, v9

Learn to build real-world apps with React 18 and React 19. Use tools like Vite, ESLint, and Prettier to scaffold a project and the latest React and TanStack features to build a complete e-commerce application.
TypeScript Fundamentals
Mike North
Stripe

TypeScript Fundamentals

TypeScript reduces bugs and improves maintainability when writing JavaScript. Learn all the key Typescript features such as variable typing, function signatures, union and intersection types, type aliases, and generics.
感谢合作伙伴对我们的支持! 了解更多。