섹션 링크 공유Syntax Features
섹션 링크 공유String Features
섹션 링크 공유Array Features
섹션 링크 공유Set Features
섹션 링크 공유Object Features
섹션 링크 공유Async Features
섹션 링크 공유Browser APIs
섹션 링크 공유Language Pain Points
섹션 링크 공유Browser APIs Pain Points
My 2025 Pick: Delba Oliveira
Ankita Kulkarni
섹션 링크 공유New Proposals
While Temporal still tops the rankings, excitement is down from last year, which makes sense as it has begun its transition from theoretical proposal to actually being implemented in Firefox.
섹션 링크 공유Missing Features
No change in ranking in the top 5, but it's notable to see that interest in Signals did drop slightly compared to last year.
섹션 링크 공유Native Types
While 32% of respondents are hoping for in-browser runtime types support in JavaScript, if types are ever officially supported it seems much more likely to be through TypeScript-like type annotations, which came in at number one.
섹션 링크 공유Pace of Change
This question's aim was to get a rough idea of how well respondents are keeping up with new features, and it shows that most of us struggle to learn about–let alone try out–new language features Hopefully this is something these survey results can help with!
섹션 링크 공유Reading List
The Reading List lets respondents learn more about specific items post-survey, and this year we tweaked it to support auto-adding items based on survey answers, in addition to letting respondents select items manually. This change led to a much more library-focused list, compared to previous years which included more features.