Salt la conținut

State of JavaScript 2025

Funcționalități

Sintaxă, API-uri de browser și alte funcționalități.

Funcționalități de sintaxă

Pe care dintre aceste funcționalități de sintaxă le-ai folosit?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
10,717
02
8,222
03
5,314
04
4,327
05
4,041
06
-1
3,383
07
-1
2,795
08
RegExp.escape
873
09
🚫 Niciuna
-3
628
10
Float16Array
533
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
12,367
95%
10

Funcționalități String

Pe care dintre aceste funcționalități String le-ai folosit?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
9,642
2
6,036
3
2,754
4
🚫 Niciuna
1,774
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
12,097
93%
10

Funcționalități Array

Pe care dintre aceste funcționalități Array le-ai folosit?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
5,419
2
+1
4,264
3
-1
4,082
4
🚫 Niciuna
3,879
5
2,349
6
1,421
7
860
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
11,604
89%
10

Set Features

Which of these Set features have you used?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
🚫 Niciuna
7,328
2
2,561
3
2,487
4
2,243
5
1,216
6
723
7
500
8
420
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
10,913
84%
10

Object Features

Which of these Object features have you used?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
🚫 Niciuna
6,387
2
4,018
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
10,405
80%
10

Funcționalități async

Pe care dintre aceste funcționalități async le-ai folosit?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
6,035
2
5,386
3
🚫 Niciuna
+1
3,186
4
1,838
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
11,506
88%
10

API-uri de browser

Pe care dintre aceste API-uri de browser le-ai folosit?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
7,595
02
5,740
03
4,061
04
2,759
05
+2
2,522
06
-1
2,517
07
-1
2,505
08
1,989
09
1,599
10
+1
1,446
11
🚫 Niciuna
-2
1,367
12
+1
1,267
13
-3
1,242
14
-3
1,116
15
-1
443
16
334
17
-2
274
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
11,918
92%
10

Puncte slabe ale limbajului

Care sunt principalele puncte slabe legate de limbajul JavaScript?
(întrebare deschisă)
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
Lack of static typing
02
Dates
+1
03
TypeScript support
+1
04
Browser support
-2
05
ESM & CJS
06
Error handling
07
Performance
08
Standard Library
+1
09
Handling objects
+2
10
Excessive complexity
+6
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
3,904
30%
20
10

Puncte slabe ale API-urilor de browser

Care sunt principalele puncte slabe legate de API-urile de browser?
(întrebare deschisă)
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
Browser support
02
browser_testing_issues
03
Safari
04
Date management
05
Performance
-1
06
Lack of documentation
-3
07
Excessive complexity
-2
08
Lack of adoption
+3
09
Chrome
10
Firefox issues
-4
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
2,340
18%
20
10
We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

My 2025 Pick: Delba Oliveira

My pick of the year is Delba Oliveira from the Next.js team. Her work across the ecosystem is remarkable. She has a rare ability to make complex topics feel simple while consistently delivering deeply practical guidance for modern Next.js, React and JS.
We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

Ankita Kulkarni

Tech Educator

New Proposals

While Temporal still tops the rankings, excitement is down from last year, which makes sense as it has begun its transition from theoretical proposal to actually being implemented in Firefox.

Which of these active JavaScript proposals are you most excited about?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
5,614
02
3,672
03
🚫 Niciuna
1,861
04
1,816
05
JSON.parse source text access
+1
1,377
06
Explicit Resource Management
-2
1,244
07
Deferring Module Evaluation
-2
832
08
Decorator Metadata
-1
763
09
523
10
Iterator Sequencing
+2
499
11
Joint Iteration
433
12
-2
427
13
Signals
+1
14
Pipe operator
15
+1
16
Pattern matching
17
Record & Tuple
-1
18
Observable
+1
19
Type Annotations
-2
20
Async Context
21
Static typing
22
Alte răspunsuri
139
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
10,675
82%
10

Funcționalități lipsă

No change in ranking in the top 5, but it's notable to see that interest in Signals did drop slightly compared to last year.

Ce simți că lipsește în JavaScript în acest moment?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
Static typing
6,177
02
Standard Library
5,441
03
Signals
3,339
04
2,943
05
Pattern Matching
2,275
06
Observable
1,595
07
+1
1,192
08
Async Context
+1
1,018
09
+3
709
10
🚫 Niciuna
643
11
+1
352
12
Composites
319
13
Error handling
14
Record & Tuple
-7
15
Enums
16
Alte răspunsuri
171
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
11,315
87%
10

Native Types

While 32% of respondents are hoping for in-browser runtime types support in JavaScript, if types are ever officially supported it seems much more likely to be through TypeScript-like type annotations, which came in at number one.

How would you like to see types implemented natively in JavaScript?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
Type annotations
5,380
2
Runtime types
3,524
3
I would not like to see them implemented
1,170
4
JSDoc-like types
901
5
Similar to TypeScript
6
Type Annotations
7
No opinion
8
Alte răspunsuri
105
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
10,934
84%
10

Pace of Change

This question's aim was to get a rough idea of how well respondents are keeping up with new features, and it shows that most of us struggle to learn about–let alone try out–new language features Hopefully this is something these survey results can help with!

How well are you generally able to keep up with new JavaScript features, such as those mentioned in this survey?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
I haven't learned about or tried out most features
2,276
2
I've learned about some of the features; but haven't tried them out
3,552
3
I've learned about and tried out some of the features
4,226
4
I've learned about most of the features and tried out some of them
1,269
5
I've learned about and tried out most of the features
292
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
11,615
89%
2.5
2
10

Lista de lectură

The Reading List lets respondents learn more about specific items post-survey, and this year we tweaked it to support auto-adding items based on survey answers, in addition to letting respondents select items manually. This change led to a much more library-focused list, compared to previous years which included more features.

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
2,702
02
2,296
03
2,004
04
1,882
05
1,825
06
1,817
07
1,782
08
1,768
09
1,475
10
1,450
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
Funcția “Lista de lectură” le permite respondenților să salveze în timp ce completează sondajul elemente despre care vor să afle mai multe; la finalul sondajului le este oferită o listă cu resurse utile.
8,987
69%
20
10

Resurse recomandate

JavaScript: The Hard Parts, v2
Will Sentance
Codesmith

JavaScript: The Hard Parts, v2

Combining mental models of JavaScript's inner workings and hands-on programming challenges, this course will give you a solid understanding of callbacks and higher-order functions, closure, asynchronous JavaScript, and object-oriented JavaScript.
Getting Started with JavaScript, v3
Web Dev Simplified

Getting Started with JavaScript, v3

Learn the language that powers the web! Gain a fundamental understanding of JavaScript as you code variables, objects, arrays, and functions.
Mulțumim partenerilor noștri pentru susținere! Află mai multe.